Attorney Nigel Hughes, who represented Attorney-at-Law Tamieka Clarke in a case involving wrongful detention by the Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU), expressed satisfaction with the Chief Justice’s ruling. However, Hughes indicated that his firm is considering challenging the compensation awarded to his client. Tiana Cole provides further details and insights into this legal decision and the potential challenge to the compensation amount in her report.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
This report highlights a significant development in the legal realm. Following the Chief Justice's ruling that the Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU) infringed upon the "fundamental rights" of Attorney-at-law Tamieka Clarke during her arrest last year, Attorney-at-Law Nigel Hughes expressed his optimism that this event would serve as a defining…
Attorney at Law, Nigel Hughes who first raised the issue that the December 21, No-Confidence motion was not carried, is this evening expressing happiness with last Friday’s ruling of the Appeal Court, however, he is mindful of the CCJ’s intended ruling on the matter. Handell Duncan has the details of…
Chief Justice (ag) Roxane George had found that the Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU) breached the “fundamental right” of Attorney-at-law Tamieka Clarke when she was arrested last year October for advising her client to remain silent. On October 28, 2022, Clarke was arrested and detained by SOCU and subsequently released…
